Monday, April 12, 2010

class and Identity

Mike Lefevre’s thought about his job as a laborer rather than working class. He clearly explained in the first line of first paragraph that he was a laborer. He had strictly muscle work. He was a good worker, but he didn’t get excited about his job. He didn’t like the foreman of his company. If it was possible then he just kicks him off. There was not good relationship between foreman and him. His thought and foreman thought was totally different.
Mike Lefevre’s thought that the main responsible to built building are laborer. The owner of house always point out “that is my house”, but they don’t know how much effort have given laborer. He is disappointed with this word. Laborers have to work in low wage and they have to work more. He tries to explain the story of laborer and try to show; what difficulties the laborers have to face in their life.

1 comment:

  1. Good reflections - the idea of recognition is something we'll talk about more - why is it so important for him to be able to point to something and say "I made that"?

    ReplyDelete